3 ms·
I'm not repeating myself again. But given your comment history I'm sure that you're just here in bad faith in general.
by cloudfifty 5y ago
I'm not repeating myself again. But given your comment history I'm sure that you're just here in bad faith in general.
- refurb 5y agoAvoiding the question just makes me think you don’t have an answer.
- cloudfifty 5y agoFor the last time. The concept of a living wage is not adapted on an individual basis. The problem of the US wrt a living wage is certainly not that single mothers of 3 children are the standard model, and you know that, hence bad faith. You can't change the subject to your own trolly question if it constitutes "corporate welfare" and expect an answer.
- refurb 5y agoYou sound very upset. It sounds like in Scandinavia you don’t worry about corporate welfare. That’s news to me, but good to know.
- cloudfifty 5y ago> You sound very upset. Not really, but what's the purpose of this particular reply other than to try to wind me up?
- refurb 5y agoYou’re avoiding answering the question.
- cloudfifty 5y agoI've answered both your original questions multiple times: > What is a "living salary"? > If I'm a single mom with 3 kids, is the "living salary" the same as a single 20 year old who lives at home? Your diversion with focusing on a new totally unfruitful topic is not my problem.
- refurb 5y agoSo you’re saying Scandinavia is ok with subsidizing the salary of certain people to make it a “living salary”? That’s a yes/no question. Not sure why you’re struggling to answer it.