2 ms·
Argument: Coal is made of carbon, and any combustion of it contributes to carbon dioxide, the primary driver of anthropogenic climate change. Putting the word
by MereInterest 5y ago
Argument: Coal is made of carbon, and any combustion of it contributes to carbon dioxide, the primary driver of anthropogenic climate change.
Putting the word "clean" behind it refers only to reduction of sulfur/nitrogen oxides, and does nothing to solve the carbon dioxide. It's a solution to the acid rain problem from several decades ago, but has minimal bearing on the current problem of climate change. At this point, it's a marketing term designed to confuse and confuddle the issue, and to imply that it's even possible for coal to be "clean".
There is everything wrong with an energy department facilitating the same old energy technologies that have no substantial differences in the ways that matter.
- roenxi 5y agoBut given that we appear to be burning the carbon anyway, it does make sense to burn it at the highest attainable efficiencies. Ignoring clever tech just means more coal burnt for nothing, in defiance of the fact that 85% of our energy comes from fossil fuel. If the tech doesn't reduce carbon emissions then it isn't exactly a dead horse. They just aren't investigating it in an effort to reduce carbon emissions.