> Eliminate the population and problem solved? Why would we have to reduce the population below a number which is sustainable? Nobody is advocating that. The

> Eliminate the population and problem solved? Why would we have to reduce the population below a number which is sustainable? Nobody is advocating that. The actual number could be fine tuned through tax breaks. Give childless couples an X% tax break. Single child families a Y% tax break. 2 child families no tax break. 3 child families a tax penalty. 4 child families a larger penalty.