5 ms·
You are right, but your premise is probably different. They were indeed wrong. They were too conservative. Some historical perspective: 1990: 1st Assessment
by clydethefrog 5y ago
You are right, but your premise is probably different. They were indeed wrong. They were too conservative.
Some historical perspective:
1990: 1st Assessment
Little observational evidence for a detectable human influence on climate
1995: 2nd Assessment
The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate
2000: 3rd Assessment
Most of the observed warming over the last fifty years is likely* to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations
* > 66% chance
2007: 4th Assessment
Most of the observed increase in global average temeratures since the mid-20th century is very likely* to to the observed increase in anthopogenic greenhouse concentrations
* > 90% chance
2016
It is extremely likely** that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
** > 95% chance
2021:
It is indisputable that human activities are causing climate change, making extreme climate events, including heat waves, heavy rainfall, and droughts, more frequent and severe.
- flat-bird 5y ago> extreme climate events, including heat waves, heavy rainfall, and droughts, more frequent and severe None of that is true. Not more frequent, not more severe. Not hurricanes, either, nor floods. Nor is loss of life due to any of those things increasing.