> “We see a decline in phone innovation” This definitely feels true (though an attempt at quantifying this statement would an intersting read) but it is not sp

> “We see a decline in phone innovation” This definitely feels true (though an attempt at quantifying this statement would an intersting read) but it is not specifically supportive of the case for AR as a successor platform. In fact understanding the causes of this "lack of innovation" would serve AR enthousiasts well. Imho, the mobile platform suffers a prolonged stagnation not because it has exhausted its intrinsic potential but due to prevailing business models: i) the user as data product and not a client - with the associated collapse of trust and limited options for value creation ii) the oligolistic market structure that motivates defensive choices (preserve existing "cash cows" rather than expand the market with the associated risk of new entrants) The range of high value applications one could envisage running on these billions of interconnected, portable "supercomputers" is stunning. The fact they are not happening is one of the biggest market failures ever. As we push beyond sustainability boundaries and desperately need information technology to help reshape our behaviors towards more balanced, just and sustainable societies it may turn out that it is also one of the gravest political and social failures. Who knows what incredible AR platforms could emerge in a moderately remote future. But in the near future the toxic digital swamp of mobile "cr-apps" does not leave much room for new growth