Even if the percentages are exaggerated, it also depends on lifestyles. If you WFH and closest contact with people is that of grocery shopping, the 2% becomes c

Even if the percentages are exaggerated, it also depends on lifestyles. If you WFH and closest contact with people is that of grocery shopping, the 2% becomes closer to 0% because you aren't going to contract the virus. But it's logical to calculate a risk percentage and then make a decision. Easy for the brain. But it simplifies reality down to a number, ignoring all those people that had adverse effects and took it on the chin in solidarity "for humanity". What did they get in return? It is a bit unethical.