3 ms·
I agree on this interpretation. The article referenced by GP cites the same paper mentioned in a different comment, see that thread for some additional discuss
by criticaltinker 5y ago
I agree on this interpretation.
The article referenced by GP cites the same paper mentioned in a different comment, see that thread for some additional discussion and citations that provide counter evidence: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28108039 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28108039.
In summary, there is currently no scientific consensus that vaccines provide 'better' immunity compared to natural infection. There is evidence that they induce similar but subtly different immune responses.
- mike00632 5y agoNobody claimed there is currently "scientific consensus" (but there is currently a lot of scientific evidence). What we're taking issue with is the unfounded claim that 'natural immunity' must be better than vaccine induced immunity.