5 ms·

I appreciate just about everything about this post, but this part keeps getting lost in everything I see written about it: >As noted, Apple says that they will

I appreciate just about everything about this post, but this part keeps getting lost in everything I see written about it: >As noted, Apple says that they will scan your Apple device for CSAM material. If they find something that they think matches, then they will send it to Apple. The problem is that you don't know which pictures will be sent to Apple. It's iCloud Photos. Apple has explicitly said it's iCloud photos. If it's being synced to iCloud Photos, you know it's getting scanned one way or another (server side, currently, or client side, going forward). It notes privacy issues, but... iCloud syncs by default. You wouldn't do the kind of work they're talking about (e.g, investigation) and store that kind of material where it could be synced to a server to begin with. Everyone keeps proclaiming that Apple is scanning your entire device, but that's not what's happening with this change. It's not even comparable to A/V in this respect - it would be a very different story if that was the case. The wording and explanation matters.

kook_throwaway 5y ago
The entire technical infrastructure to scan your entire device for arbitrary content is being built and deployed. The only change necessary to scan other files is changing a path and that's configuration that could even be silently done per-device.
- zionic 5y ago
  I love that this is the (correct) response here. /r/Apple is full of morons that read the press release and honestly believe making this system scan the whole file system is impossible.
- Klonoar 5y ago
  >The entire technical infrastructure to scan your entire device for arbitrary content is being built and deployed. It's a proprietary OS. This literally could exist already and you would have zero clue.
  - kook_throwaway 5y ago
    The difference between open and closed source is not lost to anyone on this site. There is a grand canyon sized gap between 'could already exist and you have no clue' and 'we have built and are deploying this system'.
Renaud 5y ago
The use of the detection algorithm is for iCloud only today. Now that the technology is on-board the device, how many lines of codes do you think it will take to scan the full photo-roll? Do you think that this ability will not tempt LEA, law makers, governments, to push for that ever-so-small change to the code, either for blanket monitoring (see if China is not tempted, using their own database of "illegal" content) or for targetted monitoring (some specific users, with or without valid court orders). The main issue is that the wall has been breached: monitoring data that was otherwise only on-device is now possible with little to no change as the feature is now embedded in the OS. You can argue we're not there yet and can trust Apple to do-the-right-thing and that the Rule of Law will protect citizen against abuse, but that's a big step into a worrying trend, and not all countries follow the Rule of Law and have checks and balances to avoid misuse. Don't forget that Apple abides by the laws of countries where it sells its devices. That means they will -forced or not- do what they are told.
- alisonkisk 5y ago
  Is the problem here, as so many commenters complain, that Apple won't resist the corrupt government, or is that that society as whole won't overthrow the corrupt government?
- Klonoar 5y ago
  >The use of the detection algorithm is for iCloud only today. Yes, which is what I was saying in my comment. If or when it comes to Apple changing this then I would agree it's a battle worth fighting, but that is not what is happening here and that is not what I was correcting in this article itself. >The main issue is that the wall has been breached: The wall was breached when we opted to run proprietary OS systems. You have zero clue what is going on in that OS and whether it's reporting; you have to trust the vendor on some level and Apple is being fairly transparent here. I would be far more worried if they did this without saying anything at all.
  - Johnny555 5y ago
    Yes, which is what I was saying in my comment. If or when it comes to Apple changing this then I would agree it's a battle worth fighting, but that is not what is happening here and that is not what I was correcting in this article itself. Isn't it too late to fight the battle then? They've already built the infrastructure to make it trivial to scan any file on your device.

kook_throwaway 5y ago

The entire technical infrastructure to scan your entire device for arbitrary content is being built and deployed. The only change necessary to scan other files is changing a path and that's configuration that could even be silently done per-device.

zionic 5y ago
I love that this is the (correct) response here. /r/Apple is full of morons that read the press release and honestly believe making this system scan the whole file system is impossible.
Klonoar 5y ago
>The entire technical infrastructure to scan your entire device for arbitrary content is being built and deployed. It's a proprietary OS. This literally could exist already and you would have zero clue.
- kook_throwaway 5y ago
  The difference between open and closed source is not lost to anyone on this site. There is a grand canyon sized gap between 'could already exist and you have no clue' and 'we have built and are deploying this system'.

Renaud 5y ago

The use of the detection algorithm is for iCloud only today. Now that the technology is on-board the device, how many lines of codes do you think it will take to scan the full photo-roll? Do you think that this ability will not tempt LEA, law makers, governments, to push for that ever-so-small change to the code, either for blanket monitoring (see if China is not tempted, using their own database of "illegal" content) or for targetted monitoring (some specific users, with or without valid court orders). The main issue is that the wall has been breached: monitoring data that was otherwise only on-device is now possible with little to no change as the feature is now embedded in the OS. You can argue we're not there yet and can trust Apple to do-the-right-thing and that the Rule of Law will protect citizen against abuse, but that's a big step into a worrying trend, and not all countries follow the Rule of Law and have checks and balances to avoid misuse. Don't forget that Apple abides by the laws of countries where it sells its devices. That means they will -forced or not- do what they are told.

alisonkisk 5y ago
Is the problem here, as so many commenters complain, that Apple won't resist the corrupt government, or is that that society as whole won't overthrow the corrupt government?
Klonoar 5y ago
>The use of the detection algorithm is for iCloud only today. Yes, which is what I was saying in my comment. If or when it comes to Apple changing this then I would agree it's a battle worth fighting, but that is not what is happening here and that is not what I was correcting in this article itself. >The main issue is that the wall has been breached: The wall was breached when we opted to run proprietary OS systems. You have zero clue what is going on in that OS and whether it's reporting; you have to trust the vendor on some level and Apple is being fairly transparent here. I would be far more worried if they did this without saying anything at all.
- Johnny555 5y ago
  Yes, which is what I was saying in my comment. If or when it comes to Apple changing this then I would agree it's a battle worth fighting, but that is not what is happening here and that is not what I was correcting in this article itself. Isn't it too late to fight the battle then? They've already built the infrastructure to make it trivial to scan any file on your device.