2 ms·
To counter your point, it's not just that product managers are easy to blame; it's that it's literally their job to change stuff. Developers want to change stu
by chunkyks 5y ago
To counter your point, it's not just that product managers are easy to blame; it's that it's literally their job to change stuff.
Developers want to change stuff and do greenfield because it's fun, but that's a whole different beast to a career track whose job it is to change things. This goes beyond just poor incentives ["Googler gets a raise because shiny new thing"], into "upper management have created a construct whose purpose it is to disappoint existing customers who like what's already there".
There may be an argument that you'll draw in more people with shiny stuff, than you'll lose when you break old stuff. I only have anecdotes and personal experience that that's untrue [digg? reddit? metro?], and no examples of cases showing that argument to be right.
Also, personally I get my jollies working on other people's old code. I work with several FORTRAN codebases that pre-date my birth, and I enjoy it.
- PragmaticPulp 5y ago> To counter your point, it's not just that product managers are easy to blame; it's that it's literally their job to change stuff. Sure, but companies aren't being blindsided by project managers who sneak into their org charts and start driving change unbeknownst to company leadership. They're hired to do these things and their performance is based on how well they do them, just like anyone else. This might be a good example of the struggle of middle management: You get blamed from all sides for just trying to do the job you're assigned.
- julik 5y agoIn some games the right moral choice is not to play them.