4 ms·
> "I’m going to go ahead and sort of disagree with you there." Either you didn't realize it was a quote and are lying, or you have serious issues with communic
by che_shirecat 5y ago
> "I’m going to go ahead and sort of disagree with you there."
Either you didn't realize it was a quote and are lying, or you have serious issues with communicating in the English language.
> it’s still useless rhetoric
Why?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- birdyrooster 5y agoMy first sentence, the one you quoted is actually a quote from Office Space. It’s useless rhetoric because after we agree humans will always see winners and losers, there are no further conclusions to draw. Does that mean humans will always expect a certain portion of people to be homeless, hungry, unhealthy, depressed, etc? Or does that mean that even once humans are all homed, fed, heathy and in good spirits that there will be some other metric to decide people are winning or losing life at? This solipsistic relativism can’t be applied in any particular way.