3 ms·
I don't know why you thought that personal attacks were merited here, but the fact remains that Subway removed azodicarbonamide from their bread years ago, as d
by djur 5y ago
I don't know why you thought that personal attacks were merited here, but the fact remains that Subway removed azodicarbonamide from their bread years ago, as did many other fast food chains.
https://www.eater.com/2016/8/8/12403338/subway-yoga-mat-chemical-mcdonalds-burger-king-wendys https://www.eater.com/2016/8/8/12403338/subway-yoga-mat-chem...
- goldenkey 5y agoThat doesn't make a difference. You called azodicarbonamide harmless. Companies have a culture. Their history reflects that.
- lsaferite 5y agoJust a pedantic observation. They never claimed any specific level of harmlessness. What they said was: > I'm sure they replaced it with some other equally harmless dough conditioner That could easily mean they replaced a toxic chemical with an equally toxic one. That being said, the words used certainly imply the thought that the chemical is 'mostly harmless'.