4 ms·
The difference is between this and say mandatory seatbelts is that the car won't refuse to start if it thinks that someone isn't buckled. I would refuse to buy
by kazoomonger 5y ago
The difference is between this and say mandatory seatbelts is that the car won't refuse to start if it thinks that someone isn't buckled. I would refuse to buy a car that did try that, as that's just asking for inconvenient sensor failures that leave you stranded.
- fsckboy 5y ago> I would refuse to buy a car that did ok, but if it's mandated that means you'll do without a car
- kazoomonger 5y agoThere are enough used cars available today that I'm pretty sure I could just buy used for the rest of my life and not have to worry about that. I don't think I will have to worry about it though because if such legislation ever passed, it wouldn't be long before someone got stranded in the middle of nowhere and died next to a perfectly functional car that refused to start up, the media would make a big deal about it, and the legislation would be reverted.