Whether or not overproduction or the destruction of usable surplus goods into waste is incidental or essential to capitalism is debatable, but whether or not ca

Whether or not overproduction or the destruction of usable surplus goods into waste is incidental or essential to capitalism is debatable, but whether or not capitalism is in fact the system of production and distribution that has created what the videographer in the OP documents really isn't. The incentives are also very transparent. It takes no special insight or deep research to discern why grocery stores destroy edible food when they throw it out, or as happened recently in Portland, post armed guards at dumpsters. Artificial maintenance of scarcity through the destruction of overproduced goods is not a new or rare feature of the capitalism that we have. That the volume and treatment of garbage on display here is a feature of our economic order should be no more controversial than observations about parallel features of it, like planned obsolescence. Do you demand that people make recourse to personal experience with alternative economic systems every time someone mentions the business cycle, too?