3 ms·
I wanted to see this kind of comparison in a study but this pretty poor supporting evidence for vaccine > natural immunity. 1) Low number of people studied. 2
by peteradio 5y ago
I wanted to see this kind of comparison in a study but this pretty poor supporting evidence for vaccine > natural immunity.
1) Low number of people studied.
2) Voluntary testing!!!
3) Testing occurred during the sweet spot for vaccine effectiveness (vaccine would not have waned)
4) No delta variant!!!
5) Not stratified by age group!!!
Can't we get a high statistics study with strict testing!? We have literally hundreds of millions of people who've been vaccinated, and there is no excuse to show me unstratified data as if a 20 year old has the same profile as a 60 year old.
- Miner49er 5y agoPretty sure it was stratified by age group? Other then that, I think your points stand.
- peteradio 5y agoHere's the PDF: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7032e1-H.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7032e1-H.pdf my understanding is that they are "age matched" between the control and test groups (similar age distribution can be found in each). But I want the final result quoted per age bracket. By mixing age groups you may be reducing the impact for the most important ages.