3 ms·
Yes, it's kind of weird, since there's no benefit to claiming false things like "Tesseract.js is a pure Javascript port [...]". Say it's WASM, since people ass
by mkl 5y ago
Yes, it's kind of weird, since there's no benefit to claiming false things like "Tesseract.js is a pure Javascript port [...]". Say it's WASM, since people associate that with speed and newness (and heavyweight dependencies, but there's no hiding that).
- azakai 5y agoSkimming the download, this does indeed use wasm, but it's also possible to build to pure JS with emscripten (in WASM=0 mode, wasm2js compiles the wasm to JS). Perhaps that's what they used to do and the docs have not been updated or something like that.
- mkl 5y agoStill not a "port" though.