4 ms·
>If you are a developer today learning VS Code is a better investment than learning Emacs. That is something which only time will show. Over the course of my l
by lycopodiopsida 5y ago
>If you are a developer today learning VS Code is a better investment than learning Emacs.
That is something which only time will show. Over the course of my life I've seen several hyped editors and IDE come and completely vanish: TextMate, Sublime, Atom, Eclipse, Netbeans. I have zero confidence that VSCode will still be hot in 10 years, especially given their poor choice of technology to write VSCode in and that MS is the sole driver of the project and can do or throw it out as it pleases.
A new developer is of course free to choose any tool, but in my experience every editor knowledge which is not vim or emacs can be treated as disposable, since it will not pay off in the long term. Thus, I would treat VSCode the same way as an IDE: use it for things which work out of the box and avoid investing time in any kind of fine-tuning. But certainly, if the experience out of the box is sufficient to solve problems, why not use it? An editor is not a religion and more than one or two can be used simultaneously. My "glue" for different editors are vim-keybindings. I use them in Emacs, IDEA and used them in VSCode, when I still had an usecase for it.
- bborud 5y agoI agree that the choice of implementation language was unfortunate. Which is a statement that is equally valid for VS Code and Emacs, so you get to interpret that any way you like.