3 ms·
> Case law is clear that one instance of a supervisor directing the N-word at a subordinate is sufficient to constitute severe harassment What? Co-workers bant
by moksly 5y ago
> Case law is clear that one instance of a supervisor directing the N-word at a subordinate is sufficient to constitute severe harassment
What? Co-workers bantering, maybe, but a manager or supervisor doing something like that in my country would make them virtually unemployable.
When would you ever call a subordinate something like that?
- slim 5y agoMaybe you can do it if you're black yourself and have a lot of familiarity with the person you called that name. But even if it was the case, justice is blind
- Infinitesimus 5y agoThat's unlikely to be the case given the lawsuit. Also, that's the difference between the hard "r" and the "a". You will be hard pressed to find a black person using the hard "r".
- listless 5y agoI don’t think context matters when it comes to that word. See these examples… https://time.com/5706848/black-security-guard-wisconsin-n-word/ https://time.com/5706848/black-security-guard-wisconsin-n-wo... https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/7/17/17581558/papa-john-n-word-resignation https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/7/17/17581558/papa-john-... https://variety.com/2018/film/news/jonathan-friedland-netflix-firing-1202994786/ https://variety.com/2018/film/news/jonathan-friedland-netfli...