5 ms·
Why not go the BattleNet route and just allow any name collision but appending something unique to every instance of the name? In BattleNet's case it was a numb
by alpaca128 5y ago
Why not go the BattleNet route and just allow any name collision but appending something unique to every instance of the name? In BattleNet's case it was a number, but with dependencies it might make more sense to add random words to avoid confusion. So there could be a "foo#cat" and a "foo#dog", and those names can remain unchanged forever. Or maybe go for alphanumeric IDs, though I think those would be much harder to tell apart.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]