5 ms·
On the contrary. At no point did I make a comment on your character or any other aspect of you personally. The only comments I made were specific towards your q
by thereare5lights 5y ago
On the contrary. At no point did I make a comment on your character or any other aspect of you personally. The only comments I made were specific towards your question and its implications.
You can call it a personal attack if you wish. That doesn't make it true.
> would you mind answering the question?
I won't because as I pointed out already, your question comes from a flawed premise.
- torstenvl 5y agoOh dear. I am afraid I must have communicated poorly or perhaps you misread the question. I am asking what the delta between set B (bullying) and set C (criminal activity) is. What false premise is there? If you don't think there's a delta, then you agree with me ab initio. If you do think there's a delta, then how can you say that asking what the delta is relies on a false premise?
- thereare5lights 5y agoAnd I'm telling you you can answer your own question by examining what the delta is between what is considered bullying between students in K-12 and criminal activity. Do you believe that bullying between students in K-12 is criminal activity. That's what I'm getting from you asking that question. Either that or you don't believe bullying is even a real thing.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]