4 ms·
Something I found very interesting when I learned about it several years ago: it's possible to formulate SR and GR with the Euclidean (++++) metric instead of t
by michaelsbradley 5y ago
Something I found very interesting when I learned about it several years ago: it's possible to formulate SR and GR with the Euclidean (++++) metric instead of the Minkowski (+---) or (-+++) metric. Such a formulation (there is a variety of them) is sometimes called Euclidean Relativity (ER).
See: https://www.euclideanrelativity.com/ https://www.euclideanrelativity.com/
Some ER research is particularly fascinating to me, e.g. Montanus' work on Flat Space Gravitation:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-005-6482-0 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-005-6482-0
A new description of gravitational motion will be proposed. It is part of the proper time formulation of physics as presented on the IARD 2000 conference. According to this formulation the proper time of an object is taken as its fourth coordinate. As a consequence, one obtains a circular space–time diagram where distances are measured with the Euclidean metric. The relativistic factor turns out to be of simple goniometric origin. It further follows that the Lagrangian for gravitational dynamics does not require an interpretation in terms of curvature of space–time. The flat space model for gravitational dynamics leads to the correct predictions for the bending of light, the perihelion shift of Mercury and gravitational red-shift. The new theory is free of singularities.
- Metacelsus 5y agoWasn't there a Greg Egan science fiction book about this?
- Twisol 5y agoThree of them, in fact! The series is called "Orthogonal": http://www.gregegan.net/ORTHOGONAL/ORTHOGONAL.html http://www.gregegan.net/ORTHOGONAL/ORTHOGONAL.html
- wyager 5y agoA really excellent series if you like math and physics. It gets bad reviews because most readers aren’t looking for a physics text disguised as a novel. Personally, I love it.
- jiggawatts 5y agoHis novel is of a different space time metric, the "++++" metric if I'm not mistaken. A key feature of this metric is that the temporal and spatial directions aren't fundamentally distinct. That reminds me, I have to go back and re-read the series and finish the last book...