3 ms·
I feel if it was for a purpose like this it could be contextualized to the employee (which IMO is necessary if they're going to write anything that is useful fo
by tobias__ 5y ago
I feel if it was for a purpose like this it could be contextualized to the employee (which IMO is necessary if they're going to write anything that is useful for any purpose beyond personal interest)
- lazide 5y agoIt would if he wanted to, and it’s what we generally expect of good bosses. I don’t think there is any rule requiring it anywhere I’ve seen.
- PhasmaFelis 5y ago> I don’t think there is any rule requiring it anywhere I’ve seen. No one claimed there was. They said that not doing it makes him a bad boss. You seem to be in agreement.
- lazide 5y agoAh, but the context of the thread is more than that! The context is around outrage that he got promoted. And being promoted is about a lot more than if someone is a good boss, as painful as that is for many folks working for such a bad boss. It’s possible to get an immense amount done and/or be remarkable effective despite being a bad boss - if the folks working for them put up with it. And it isn’t illegal to be a bad boss, as long as someone is bad in specific ways and not others.