4 ms·
> I suspect that's why they have some threshold that moves the false positive rate to one in one trillion. So now instead of sending just one nice innocent ver
by skinkestek 5y ago
> I suspect that's why they have some threshold that moves the false positive rate to one in one trillion.
So now instead of sending just one nice innocent very high resolution images of "Tokyo City" or something with something horrific hidden somewhere you have to send a few such images.
That is reassuring. I can never believe anyone except me will think about that.
(If the system is too dumb to detect this it is worthless, and if it is smart enough this opens the floodgates for anyone wanting to make trouble for just about anyone.)
- nomel 5y agoThis would require multiple hash collisions.
- skinkestek 5y agoNo need for hash collisions, that's what makes it so bad: just edit multiple known verybad images in multiple nice high res photos like I tried to explain above.
- nomel 5y agoIt’s a visual hash, not something like an md5. And now you’re talking of a directed attack to intentionally make hash collisions?