4 ms·
Let‘s play a simple game. Go to https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/CSAM_Detection_Technical_Summary.pdf https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/CSAM_Detecti
by axiosgunnar 5y ago
Let‘s play a simple game.
Go to https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/CSAM_Detection_Technical_Summary.pdf https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/CSAM_Detection_Techni...
and then replace
- "National Center for Missing and Exploited Children“ with „the new Trump administration“
- „child pornography“ with „LGBT content“
Doesn't look fun anymore, does it?
(use „the new Clinton administration“ and „images of guns“ if you are conservative)
- AlexSW 5y agoI'm not sure of the point you're getting at. You can do this with effectively anything. Replace "gay marriage" with "child sexual exploitation" in "I support gay marriage". Does that mean we shouldn't support anything?
- indymike 5y ago> Does that mean we shouldn't support anything? Op is pointing out what a universal evil Apple's scanning of personal property at scale is.
- jbuhbjlnjbn 5y agoI understand you wanted to refute the former comment, but, ironically, that is indeed the case in point: when we cannot trust that the the thing we support won't be exchanged with something else in the future we don't support, without our knowledge, then we indeed should not support it.