3 ms·
Considered, sure. But easily rejected. Let’s be grownups here.
by jasonlfunk 5y ago
Considered, sure. But easily rejected. Let’s be grownups here.
- dmitrygr 5y agoYes, indeed, let's! Grownups recognize that strip searches are unwarranted in this and most other cases, be they physical OR digital... And certainly you've heard of software bugs. You do not think that a small one like "accidentally" "forgetting" to check that a photo had been synced cannot happen, and an "accidental" scan of ALL photos couldn't possibly happen in any situation no matter what bug/corruption/etc? Surely you'll share with the class where YOU hire infallible programmers. An accidental strip search is a strip search nonetheless. Luckily, this can all be solved by NOT writing such code. Ever.
- jpxw 5y agoYou must surely realise that there’s a fairly large difference between being strip-searched and having a hash computed on one of your photos that you’re uploading to iCloud.
- dmitrygr 5y agoYou must surely realize that slippery slopes exist. And as soon as adversarial code exists in your device, it will only expand. Reference: history of literally every dictatorship includes many "reasonable" expansions of power in the name of security/safety/etc...
- jpxw 5y agoYes, but I think you’d agree that each slippery slope has a certain degree of probability. The slippery slope from Apple checking image hashes to hourly strip-searches seems rather unlikely, which makes your analogy unhelpful.
- Nginx487 5y agoDon't see any difference. In both cases your private property forcibly accessed without any reason to suspect you, but rather out of preventive reasons.