4 ms·
> It does kind of bother me that Org doesn't have a particularly good formal spec. We're working on it [0, 1]. 0. https://orgmode.org/list/CA+G3_POBAB1QX1Zv8
by tgbugs 5y ago
> It does kind of bother me that Org doesn't have a particularly good formal spec.
We're working on it [0, 1].
0. https://orgmode.org/list/CA+G3_POBAB1QX1Zv8q9sjFh4KHUHVmaNXp3XO7__6eoSdXKoyA@mail.gmail.com/ https://orgmode.org/list/CA+G3_POBAB1QX1Zv8q9sjFh4KHUHVmaNXp...
1. https://github.com/tgbugs/laundry/tree/next https://github.com/tgbugs/laundry/tree/next
- danShumway 5y agoNice, thanks for linking! I'm excited to see stuff like this, I think a formal grammar would open a lot of doors for more tools to get built around the format.
- yewenjie 5y agoWhile org-mode parsers are being written in many languages, what is the best currently available alternative to the org-element API in any other language than Emacs Lisp?