3 ms·
I was unhappy to find this comment so far down and even unhappier to see it downvoted. I'm not a fan of the decrease in privacy Apple is creating with this move
by fogof 5y ago
I was unhappy to find this comment so far down and even unhappier to see it downvoted. I'm not a fan of the decrease in privacy Apple is creating with this move but I think this forum has gotten its feelings for Apple caught up with its response to a completely valid criticism of an anti-Apple article.
To explain things even further, let's say that the perceptual algorithm makes a false positive 1% of the time. That is, 1 in every 100 completely normal pictures are incorrectly matched with some picture in the child pornography database. There's no reason to think (at least none springs to mind, happy to hear suggestions) that a false positive in one image will make it any more likely to see a false positive in another image. Thus, if you have a phone with 1000 pictures on it, and it takes 40 trigger a match, there's less than a 1 in a trillion probability that this would happen if the pictures are all normal.
- IfOnlyYouKnew 5y agoAt this point, the COVID vaccines seem to barely have majority support on HN, and “cancel culture” would win any survey on our times’ top problems, beating “women inventing stories of rape’ and “the black guy mentioning something borderline political at work, just because he’s paid 5/8th as much as others”. An inability to follow even the most elementary argument from statistics isn’t really surprising. Although I can’t quite say if it’s actual inability, or follows from the fact that it supports the wrong outcome.