4 ms·
> next 50 years (assuming they'd work that long...) I don't think this is reasonable, even if you started working at age 20 at a FAANG, you're not going to wor
by vecinu 5y ago
> next 50 years (assuming they'd work that long...)
I don't think this is reasonable, even if you started working at age 20 at a FAANG, you're not going to work until you're 70.
Keep in mind this industry is very ageist, you'd be lucky to even get 30 years of high salary income if you're not exceptionally good. That's assuming you don't burn out.
I'm surprised folks still use unrealistic examples such as these to move discussions in a certain direction.
- rootusrootus 5y ago> Keep in mind this industry is very ageist, you'd be lucky to even get 30 years of high salary income In the valley maybe, at a FAANG. In the regular world, esp F500 companies, there are lots of old folks. I work with several developers in their 60s. Could they get Google to hire them? Maybe not. They're still pulling down middle 100s. > I'm surprised folks still use unrealistic examples such as these You're referring, I hope, to the original comment that $3000 over 50 years was a deal breaker. I am not the one who thought that a 50 year time horizon made any sense at all for this discussion, I'm just playing along.
- vecinu 5y agoI agree with you, outside of SV I did see older folks at tech companies. > I am not the one who thought that a 50 year time horizon made any sense at all for this discussion, I'm just playing along. That's my bad, I thought you initially brought up the 50 years of working at a FAANG-level company to not care of TLD fees.