4 ms·
> Why do people assume that the Mozilla foundation is a clueless scammer? It's not an assumption, it's an evaluation they are continuing to earn by quacking li
by slapfrog 5y ago
> Why do people assume that the Mozilla foundation is a clueless scammer?
It's not an assumption, it's an evaluation they are continuing to earn by quacking like a duck.
- tuukkah 5y agoCan you point to something concrete that makes Privacy Not Included clueless or scammy? EDIT: Or if it's that the foundation did some clueless and scammy things earlier that cost them all their reputation, what were they?
- slapfrog 5y agoScammy: years of soliciting donations from the public without making it explicitly clear that none of those donations will ever fund firefox development, and instead go to BS projects like this and bloated salaries for under-performing busybodies in management.