3 ms·
I really don't like the comments here. Why do people assume that the Mozilla foundation is a clueless scammer? Before questioning their methods and motives, how
by tuukkah 5y ago
I really don't like the comments here. Why do people assume that the Mozilla foundation is a clueless scammer? Before questioning their methods and motives, how about reading what the site says:
"Welcome to Mozilla’s Privacy Not Included buyer’s guide. Our goal is to help you shop smart—and safe—for products that connect to the internet.
In 2017, when we first started Privacy Not Included, we didn’t know if people would be interested in a guide about the privacy and security of connected toys, gadgets, and smart home products. Turns out, they were. [--]" https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/about/why/ https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/about/w...
- slapfrog 5y ago> Why do people assume that the Mozilla foundation is a clueless scammer? It's not an assumption, it's an evaluation they are continuing to earn by quacking like a duck.
- tuukkah 5y agoCan you point to something concrete that makes Privacy Not Included clueless or scammy? EDIT: Or if it's that the foundation did some clueless and scammy things earlier that cost them all their reputation, what were they?
- slapfrog 5y agoScammy: years of soliciting donations from the public without making it explicitly clear that none of those donations will ever fund firefox development, and instead go to BS projects like this and bloated salaries for under-performing busybodies in management.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]