> when phones aren't a primary tool of trafficing illegal content? Are they not? This is just an assumption you have made. It doesn’t matter what I think abou

> when phones aren't a primary tool of trafficing illegal content? Are they not? This is just an assumption you have made. It doesn’t matter what I think about it I asked: > Do you believe that sexual predators sharing images with children on iPhones is a problem? You haven’t answered. >>It seems like you are simply stating that the other side’s priorities are wrong. > This is a juvenile attempt at a nobility argument. No it isn’t. It is an honest attempt to characterize your approach. It seems clear that you think the other sides priorities are wrong. That’s fine. I have to assume everyone thinks that. The point is that it doesn’t matter that you think they are wrong. You have already lost. The things you don’t want are already happening. My argument is that since that debate is lost, any attempt to restore privacy must accept that other people’s priorities are different. Simply trying to get the other side to change priorities when you are already losing doesn’t seem like a good approach.