3 ms·
One was on there because last year they didn't meet their "security standards" whatever those are but this year they do. So they improve in your eyes but you're
by that_guy_iain 5y ago
One was on there because last year they didn't meet their "security standards" whatever those are but this year they do. So they improve in your eyes but you're still going to bash on them. Another one was that in the past there was a security hole. Those were the first two items I clicked.
Honestly, I think this is the worst Mozilla thing I've seen. It's all preachy on things from the past.