> Partly it falls under the supposition of "if they can, they will". Hm. But there are many millions of things Apple could do, but haven’t, because it would hu

> Partly it falls under the supposition of "if they can, they will". Hm. But there are many millions of things Apple could do, but haven’t, because it would hurt their business model. So how would what you are proposing they will do help their business model? > Which means they need some kind of tech to detect "naked" pictures, locally, across encrypted channels, in order to block them. I know you know this is the case, but to make it clear for anyone reading: Apple is not blocking nude pictures in the kids filter. It’s blurring and giving a message. Again I ask: why would using this technology on non-nude stuff benefit Apple? Are we worried about Apple or are we worried about the government forcing Apple to do things that this technology enables?