3 ms·
“This almost certainly will be abused.” is a claim by you and completely unverifiable. Apple has published white papers explaining how their hashing, matching,
by robertoandred 5y ago
“This almost certainly will be abused.” is a claim by you and completely unverifiable. Apple has published white papers explaining how their hashing, matching, and cryptography work. How do you see someone thwarting that process specifically?
- drampelt 5y agoApple's claims on how it will work are also completely unverifiable. What's stopping a government from providing Apple with hashes of any other sort of content they dislike?
- robertoandred 5y agoAnd then Apple reviews the account and sees that what was flagged was not CSAM. And again, the hashes aren’t of arbitrary subject matter, they’re of specific images. Using that to police subject matter would be ludicrous.
- drampelt 5y agoHow would Apple know what the content was that was flagged if all they are provided with is a list of hashes? I completely agree it's ludicrous, but there are plenty of countries that want that exact functionality.
- robertoandred 5y agoThe matched image’s decrypted security voucher includes a “visual derivative.” I’m sure in other words they can do some level of human comparison to verify that it is or is not a valid match.
- gordon_gee123 5y agoIf they have the hash/derivative they dont need to look on device or even decrypt, theyll know that data with this hash is on device, and presumably 100s of other matching hashes from the same device
- JohnFen 5y agoEasy -- by having the authorities expand what is being searched for.