> That isn't to say that you should give to thunderbird, since they are currently disappointing you, but it is a bit of a vicious cycle. Well, not exactly, bec

> That isn't to say that you should give to thunderbird, since they are currently disappointing you, but it is a bit of a vicious cycle. Well, not exactly, because while it was on low-effort maintenance mode, there was no such changes; it was just doing the same job in the same way since forever. Problems arose when a new team with a new mission, new funding, and worst of all, "new" ideas ("new" being the same fate other pieces of software underwent in the last decade: inserting more web tech, changing the look into something more modern, i.e. more web-like), became active.