3 ms·
I understand the point you're trying to make, but unless they're excluding white people from subscribing I have a hard time accepting it. An industry that comes
by werber 5y ago
I understand the point you're trying to make, but unless they're excluding white people from subscribing I have a hard time accepting it. An industry that comes to mind is haircare, there are tons of brands and a long history of companies that explictly cater to black hair ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madam_C._J._Walker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madam_C._J._Walker , is a great person to look into ). I can buy products from those companies, despite their focus being on the black community, and many being black owned. Conversely, the majority of haircare products available cater to more traditionally white hair types and black people are free to buy them. There is no exclusion, just a market where the majority of the products cater to the majority of people, and there was a market need filled to cater to the minority. A haircare company in say, Nigeria, would not have to go out of their way to say it's catering to black hair, just like Nollywood does not have to say it's featuring black voices, it's just understood that it's a representation of the majority of the population.
- RHSeeger 5y ago> but unless they're excluding white people from subscribing I have a hard time accepting it My apologies; I must not have been clear. Nothing here is an example of something I have an issue with. I was merely pointing out that having "X for <minority>" can go two ways; promote the minority, or exclude the majority. The former is great, the later is not. I wasn't, in any way, trying to indicate the post is doing the wrong thing. As others have noted, it sounds like a Netflix-ey version of BET which, as far as I know, hasbeen nothing but positive.