14 ms·
> What right do you have to enforce your own morals upon an entire other nation? Careful with this argument. What right did the Northern States have to enforce
by wizzwizz4 5y ago
> What right do you have to enforce your own morals upon an entire other nation?
Careful with this argument. What right did the Northern States have to enforce their own morals upon the Southern States (which had ceded, and were therefore their own country)?
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying this is not valid justification.
- inetknght 5y ago> What right did the Northern States have to enforce their own morals upon the Southern States (which had ceded, and were therefore their own country)? That's a very good argument. But let me counter: we fought a war over it. That's what gives us the right to enforce the North's morals over the South's. Do you want to fight a war against China over our differences? Even disregarding the war itself; that was about slavery and human rights (freedom) with strong undertones of racism. So if you want to make privacy a human rights issue then sure and yes. I'll even agree with you: I think privacy should be a human right! But until privacy is a human right recognized and enforced then again: what right do we have to enforce your own morals upon an entire nation? UN's UDHR Article 12 [0] is very light about privacy (and what it even means) and (IMO) has a very very poor history of enforcement of human rights. Even more, it states: > No one shall be subjected ... to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. And I would argue that statement extends to calling someone "sexy" which might be an insult to someone with different morals than yours. [0]: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-huma...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]