3 ms·
Both of the announced features sound fine on their own — Apple has always been able to scan iCloud and send your data to police [0], and PhotoDNA is a decade ol
by danso 5y ago
Both of the announced features sound fine on their own — Apple has always been able to scan iCloud and send your data to police [0], and PhotoDNA is a decade old; whereas on-device machine learning on kid phones does not (according to Apple) involve sending anything to Apple reviewers and the govt.
But announcing both features in the same post makes it inevitable that they get conflated, e.g. “Apple’s machine learning will send suspected child porn-like images from your iMessages to iCloud, where it will be reviewed and possibly sent to the police”. Apple obviously knows this — so them being ok with that raises some serious eyebrows, as if they’re quietly setting the groundwork to make that a reality.
[0] https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-fbi-icloud-investigation-seattle-protester-arson-2020-9 https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-fbi-icloud-investigati...
- koolhaas 5y ago> Apple has always been able to scan iCloud and send your data to police I don’t see how the article you linked to explains how Apple can “scan iCloud” for the police. What do you mean? It seems like they just hand data over for a specific warrant related to individual users.
- danso 5y agoSorry, are you insinuating that Apple has the ability to retrieve, read, and provide the unencrypted data from users' iCloud accounts, but not the ability to search across that data?