4 ms·
Of course I would campaign for it to be accessible. It would be a complete revolution in archeology, architecture, engineering, maintenance, rescue and firefigh
by glogla 5y ago
Of course I would campaign for it to be accessible. It would be a complete revolution in archeology, architecture, engineering, maintenance, rescue and firefighting and geology should it also work on rocks.
Not sure I see the relation to Apple laying Fully Automated AI ThinkPol groundwork though.
- nine_k 5y agoI love the different angle you've taken! Let's assume that it only works with thin walls, so it has limited archaeology use. Firefighting is a very fair point. Would you, reader, trust the firefighters to not abuse such a power by mistake? Would you trust the chance of it being abused for the chance of being rescued during a serious fire? Not an easy question.
- wizzwizz4 5y agoYou can put checks and balances in place. Firefighters have vehicles with ladders, but they don't drive up to houses and break-and-enter. If it can be made obvious when they're using it, and there's independent oversight, I think the trade-off is definitely worth it.