4 ms·
Apple have a fairly detailed page on the approach including independent evaluations. Which states that it’s only for iCloud. But there’s no reason why this coul
by new299 5y ago
Apple have a fairly detailed page on the approach including independent evaluations. Which states that it’s only for iCloud. But there’s no reason why this couldn’t change in the future.
https://www.apple.com/child-safety/ https://www.apple.com/child-safety/
- sharken 5y agoOn face value alone that should reassure sceptics that this new scanner will only be used for good purposes. However there is a very long list of companies not just doing things for good, but also for profit. And when profit enters the equation, then the original mission statement tends to get distorted into something bad/worse. Of course Apple is free to decide, but the consumer has the option to either loudly disagree or exit the Apple ecosystem altogether.
- gambiting 5y agoThe thing is, that it's as always - anyone arguing against this system will be branded as a pedophile sympathiser.
- sharken 5y agoWell, simple minded people will always try to use that rhetoric. I see the same pattern with pro-vaccine and "anti-vax", either you support vaccines or you are labeled "anti-vax", all is black-and-white without any nuances. That sort of discussion rarely leads to any productive outcome.
- cbnotfromthere 5y ago<< either you support vaccines or you are labeled "anti-vax">> Well, by definition anyone not supporting vaccines IS anti-vax. There is no such thing akin to agnosticism with regard to vaccinations.