3 ms·
He means AGI is not a meaningful term, because 'general' is too ambiguous - ie, even human intelligence is not truly general. So it's a meaningless term accordi
by andreyk 5y ago
He means AGI is not a meaningful term, because 'general' is too ambiguous - ie, even human intelligence is not truly general. So it's a meaningless term according to him. I think he would not oppose a term such as 'superhuman AI'. He goes into this in some depth in lex fridman's interview of him, can check that out if you're curious.