3 ms·
Thanks for clarifying, but they have no case here - even the judge agrees. Would be interesting to know what they've actually trademarked? That no other brand
by uxcolumbo 5y ago
Thanks for clarifying, but they have no case here - even the judge agrees.
Would be interesting to know what they've actually trademarked? That no other brand can use a shade of blue on their packaging when selling oat drinks?
I can understand if Glebe Farms called their product Oaty, but they called it PureOaty - doesn't even start with the same letter and their packaging looks different, not as polished as Oatly's packaging.
Edit: In the BBC article they claimed the 'y' is the offender. But oaty is an adjective, hence the name PureOaty to create a product name.
- zamalek 5y ago> [Article] A spokeswoman for Oatly said the company would not be appealing the decision. Oatly clearly agrees, too. The judge declared their brand/trade dress safe.