> these notifications give the sense that Apple is watching over the user’s shoulder—and in the case of under-13s, that’s essentially what Apple has given pare

> these notifications give the sense that Apple is watching over the user’s shoulder—and in the case of under-13s, that’s essentially what Apple has given parents the ability to do. Well, yes? Parents are already legally responsible for their young children and under their supervision. The alternative would be to not even give such young children these kind of devices to begin with - which might actually be preferable. > this system will give parents who do not have the best interests of their children in mind one more way to monitor and control them True. But the ability to send or receive explicit images would most likely not be the biggest issue they would be facing. I understand the slippery slope argument the EFF is making, but they should keep to the government angle. Having the ability for governments to deploy specific machine learning classifiers is not a good thing.