The original argument was: > depending on a vaccine based on a single gene is what will (has already) lead to variants It's the "(has already)" part that you'

The original argument was: > depending on a vaccine based on a single gene is what will (has already) lead to variants It's the "(has already)" part that you're overly fixated on, and is not a charitable interpretation of the comment given the extraordinary amount of supporting evidence I've provided. Listen to the feedback you're getting from others here - it doesn't seem to be getting through to you.