3 ms·
An interesting question that's still TBD is how well companies can operate with a significant in-office team and remote team. I think this past 18 months has pr
by rdgthree 5y ago
An interesting question that's still TBD is how well companies can operate with a significant in-office team and remote team. I think this past 18 months has proven that fully remote can work, but it may be the case that a 50/50 remote/office split is significantly harder to manage.
Anecdotally, my company had an office team and a remote team split about 50/50 before and unrelated to COVID, and it was tricky. We don't have a lot of meetings, but when we did, it was hard to have a physical group in a conference room with a remote group on a screen. We solved that by effectively going fully remote for meetings that involved remote employees - everyone who was physically in the office would connect to a video call at their individual desks. I was personally fine with it, but some people definitely prefer (and work better in) that physical conference room setting.
All of that to say, the way one person works might be a forcing factor for others, even if they don't intend for it to be. Tricky problem.
- ghaff 5y agoIf I'm in a meeting of any size, I'm dealing with people spread over offices and remote across North America and Europe anyway. >We solved that by effectively going fully remote for meetings that involved remote employees Yes, this is the process that teams within my extended team mostly follow.
- R0b0t1 5y agoI've been in physical/remote meeting splits. It's not really that hard. The trick is having everyone sign into the meeting with their own PC.