3 ms·
3x != 2x, and I suspect 3x is still too low; also comparing median salaries is not enough.
by goodpoint 5y ago
3x != 2x, and I suspect 3x is still too low; also comparing median salaries is not enough.
- oblio 5y agoI said: > I'd imagine that the average ratio would be closer to 2-3x To which you replied: > 10% is a gross exaggeration but "the average ratio would be closer to 2-3x" sounds equally exaggerated in the other direction. My original example pointed to the top of the range and then I used the median, which is the statistically most relevant indicator for comparing salaries. > 3x != 2x, and I suspect 3x is still too low; also comparing median salaries is not enough. At this point, you're arguing in bad faith.