37 ms·
The post felt like a tabloid piece -- it does not show that the Presidental Election was hacked, but rather that it could have been hacked. It then goes on to s
by eggbrain 15y ago
The post felt like a tabloid piece -- it does not show that the Presidental Election was hacked, but rather that it could have been hacked. It then goes on to say things like "Connell died a month and a half after giving this deposition in a suspicious small plane crash" seemingly to imply that he was murdered, but stops before going any deeper than that.
Finally, lets look at who wrote this -- a member of the Co-Counsel in the King Lincoln vs Blackwell case, not exactly the most unbiased of people.
- boredguy8 15y agoFor what it's worth, the plaintiffs claimed to have received a tip that Mike Connell was being threatened for providing testimony against Karl Rove. That testimony was provided in a sworn affidavit. So one can speculate as to whether or not the anonymous tip was a legitimate threat, but the concept you criticize has a basis in the events surrounding this case.
- 3am 15y agoThe article says that the system architecture existed for no other plausible purpose than altering the data, that exit polling supports that the data was altered, and that public employees were not allowed access to the data collection process. Further, Connell died in a plain crash after the lead plaintiff's attorney reported death threats against him to the US AG.