2 ms·
And? You're just presenting the other side of "arguably". Thanks, but unnecessary.
by LightG 5y ago
And?
You're just presenting the other side of "arguably". Thanks, but unnecessary.
- jaywalk 5y agoI'm saying that the argument in "arguably" is one that could be made over just about any safety/security measure implemented by a government, and so it isn't much of an argument. Your little snipe was arguably unnecessary.
- LightG 5y agoNot sure what you're trying to get to here. So what if "many people" believe X, Y, or Z. Who cares? NZ decided on a course of action. They implemented it. They arguably saved tens of thousands of lives. That's the truth. Their government was presumably elected democratically, so what more is there to say? The OP said he felt bad for NZ'ers. I don't, and I said why. What more would you like?