3 ms·
I think the argument is that it shouldn't take 10 readings to understand a very clear and good paper in your field. There's likely an easier way to communicate
by sxg 5y ago
I think the argument is that it shouldn't take 10 readings to understand a very clear and good paper in your field. There's likely an easier way to communicate dense information.
- abdullahkhalids 5y agoYou should try writing papers. Most papers take many months to write, hundreds of hours, go through many revisions and rewrites. People try really hard to write good papers. Everyone knows well written papers get cited more. But synthesizing newly discovered knowledge that only a handful you know (and often don't even understand all aspects of), into something others can understand is far harder than you think it is.