3 ms·

Since they positioned themselves against free speech and advocate certain ideologies, they have lost me forever. Good riddance. I never worried about the perfo

Since they positioned themselves against free speech and advocate certain ideologies, they have lost me forever. Good riddance. I never worried about the performance of Firefox. It was good enough, and I miss some features like tags for bookmarks. But a betrayal of their original mission is unforgivable. Yes, other browsers belong to evil corporations, but at least they never claimed to be good to begin with.

tziki 5y ago
Context?
- MatteoFrigo 5y ago
  Not OP, but here is some context: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplatforming/ https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplat...
  - yololol 5y ago
    Now you're putting words in people's mouths :) FF has been involved with politics on way more than that. I don't know about the OP but you don't have to be a Trumpist to be put off by FF's campaigns.
    - horrified 5y ago
      (I'm the OP) It's not about Trump it is about the stated intent to amplify certain news outlets (they link to the New York Times as a "factual voice that needs to be amplified") and tone done or censor ("deplatform") others. I don't want my Browser to do that.
      - rvz 5y ago
        Nor do I want my browser to violate its own intended purpose. They are essentially preaching 'privacy' to those wanting to a privacy-focused browser and product and having that as its main unique selling point but then is paid by an anti-privacy company 'Google' which contradicts everything in Mozilla's mission statement. Plus, Mozilla sort of did this to themselves anyway and turned Google into a direct competitor with Chrome.
progre 5y ago
Eh, I can think of one evil company that used to have "don't be evil" or something like that as their motto in the distant past. I hear they make a pretty popular browser now.
- horrified 5y ago
  I'm actually also not a fan of Google anymore, but I can at least relate to the "don't be evil" issue. It simply wasn't well enough defined, as different people consider different things "evil".
yololol 5y ago
That was the main reason I left FF after being a user since Mozilla 1.0

tziki 5y ago

Context?

MatteoFrigo 5y ago
Not OP, but here is some context: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplatforming/ https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplat...
- yololol 5y ago
  Now you're putting words in people's mouths :) FF has been involved with politics on way more than that. I don't know about the OP but you don't have to be a Trumpist to be put off by FF's campaigns.
  - horrified 5y ago
    (I'm the OP) It's not about Trump it is about the stated intent to amplify certain news outlets (they link to the New York Times as a "factual voice that needs to be amplified") and tone done or censor ("deplatform") others. I don't want my Browser to do that.
    - rvz 5y ago
      Nor do I want my browser to violate its own intended purpose. They are essentially preaching 'privacy' to those wanting to a privacy-focused browser and product and having that as its main unique selling point but then is paid by an anti-privacy company 'Google' which contradicts everything in Mozilla's mission statement. Plus, Mozilla sort of did this to themselves anyway and turned Google into a direct competitor with Chrome.

progre 5y ago

Eh, I can think of one evil company that used to have "don't be evil" or something like that as their motto in the distant past. I hear they make a pretty popular browser now.

horrified 5y ago
I'm actually also not a fan of Google anymore, but I can at least relate to the "don't be evil" issue. It simply wasn't well enough defined, as different people consider different things "evil".

yololol 5y ago

That was the main reason I left FF after being a user since Mozilla 1.0