5 ms·
It's in "direct" opposition to them in the same way drink driving laws are in "direct" opposition to people who have no intention of driving drunk. It's a rest
by ChrisKnott 5y ago
It's in "direct" opposition to them in the same way drink driving laws are in "direct" opposition to people who have no intention of driving drunk.
It's a restriction on their liberty and privacy that they willingly support because of the overall positive effects.
Anyway I'll duck out of this now the driveby downvotes annoy me.
- furi 5y agoIf drunk driving laws were enforced by mandating a breathalyzer in every car and nobody really knew how the breathalyzer worked and also it maybe doubled as an instrument for the government to catch you doing fifteen other things then I might consider that a fair comparison. But yes, there's a lot of drive-by engagement in this thread, thank you for at least engaging with it directly.
- somebodythere 5y agoFunny enough, the recent infrastructure bill in the US includes provisions for all new cars to be fitted with breathalyzer-like devices.